#image_title
An Indiana police officer, on duty at the time, was charged with DUI / DWI (OWI)—including allegations consistent with drugged driving—and a jury found NOT GUILTY on all counts. The defense team from The Marc Lopez Law Firm—Naun Benitez and Zac Bailey—showed the evidence didn’t meet Indiana’s burden of proof.
What Happened—and Why It Matters
When a police officer is accused of DUI / DWI while on duty, public pressure can get ahead of the facts. Headlines may imply guilt, but Indiana courts require evidence, not assumptions. In this high-profile case, after a full jury trial, the verdict was clear: NOT GUILTY.
This outcome underscores a core truth about Indiana DUI / DWI Defense (legally OWI): the State must prove impairment beyond a reasonable doubt. If the proof is weak, incomplete, or scientifically unreliable, the only lawful result is acquittal.
Redacted Copy of the jury verdict
Key Takeaways for Indiana DUI / DWI (OWI) Cases
Trial Team: The Marc Lopez Law Firm’s Naun Benitez and Zac Bailey led the defense and tried the case to a Not Guilty verdict.
Lead trial attorneys Naun Benitez & Zac Bailey
Indiana statutes use OWI (Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated). Most people—and search engines—say DUI / DWI. Practically, we’re talking about the same idea: alleged impairment by alcohol, drugs, or both. If you’re searching for Indiana DUI / DWI Defense or information on drugged driving, you’re in the right place.
Every case is unique, but these recurring issues often decide DUI / DWI trials:
Roadside observations can be influenced by fatigue, nerves, medical conditions, weather, or lighting. Standardized field sobriety tests must be administered and interpreted correctly. Body-cam and dash-cam footage can cut both ways—and often exposes inconsistencies.
Toxicology in drugged driving cases is complex. The presence of metabolites in blood or urine doesn’t automatically show current impairment at the time of driving. Calibration records, chain of custody, sample handling, and reporting thresholds all matter.
Delays between the stop, testing, and observed behavior can break the causal link the State must prove. Jurors look for credible timing that connects alleged impairment to the act of operating the vehicle.
Indiana requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If the State’s case leaves reasonable questions unanswered, jurors must acquit—no matter the headlines.
Trial-ready strategy matters from Day 1. Early investigation preserves videos, dispatch audio, lab data, and witnesses that can change the outcome.
Is DUI / DWI the same as OWI in Indiana?
Yes. Indiana charges OWI, but most people say DUI / DWI. The practical defenses overlap.
Can someone be charged while on duty?
Yes. The law applies to everyone. But allegations still require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
What turns a drugged driving case?
Science. Accurate toxicology, proper procedures, and credible timelines. Presence alone isn’t impairment.
Do I need a lawyer for a first offense?
Absolutely. Early defense steps can preserve evidence and shape negotiations—or a trial.
At The Marc Lopez Law Firm, our trial teams—including Naun Benitez and Zac Bailey—build cases with four pillars:
That’s how we defend Indiana DUI / DWI and drugged driving cases—whether low-profile or under a media spotlight.
Facing Indiana DUI / DWI or drugged driving charges? Talk with a trial-ready team.
The Marc Lopez Law Firm
Call 463-946-0521 • Free consultation • Available 24/7