If you’re facing DUI (driving under the influence) or OVWI (operating a vehicle while intoxicated) charges in Indiana, knowing your rights around Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) is crucial to building a sound defense. Here at the Marc Lopez Law Firm, we understand the challenges you’re up against, and we’re here to help. Let’s unpack the history, purpose, and limitations of SFSTs and explain how we work to protect our clients’ rights in DUI and OWI cases.
SFSTs are a set of roadside assessments designed to help law enforcement identify signs of impairment. Developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), SFSTs consist of three primary tests: the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN), Walk-and-Turn (WAT), and One-Leg Stand (OLS). Their purpose is to provide a structured approach to help officers assess a driver’s sobriety and, in certain cases, establish probable cause for an arrest. However, as we’ll discuss, these tests have limitations that are critical to understand, especially when building a defense.
In Indiana, officers may ask you to perform SFSTs if they suspect impairment based on observable behavior, scent of alcohol, or other sensory indicators. But while these tests are widely used, they’re not infallible and don’t provide direct evidence of your blood alcohol content (BAC). Each SFST is intended to evaluate different aspects of coordination, attention, and balance, but there are many legitimate reasons—such as anxiety, fatigue, or medical conditions—that can negatively impact performance on these tests. Knowing the limitations of SFSTs and the conditions under which they were conducted can make a significant difference in your case.
SFSTs originated in the 1970s when NHTSA partnered with the International Association of Chiefs of Police to develop reliable roadside tests for impairment. These tests were standardized by the early 1980s, and law enforcement agencies across the country adopted them as a consistent method for identifying impaired drivers. The goal was to create an objective framework that officers could rely on, but as our attorneys know, SFSTs are not without flaws. The testing protocols are rigid, and any deviation by officers can call the test results into question.
SFSTs are observational tools, not definitive measures of BAC or intoxication. While officers are trained to administer them under standardized guidelines, environmental factors like road conditions, weather, and lighting can impact your performance. Additionally, SFSTs often only provide circumstantial evidence of impairment, meaning that even a poor test result doesn’t guarantee that you’re over the legal BAC limit or impaired to the point of being unable to safely operate a vehicle.
The attorneys at Marc Lopez Law Firm are well-versed in the practical and legal limitations of SFSTs. Here are just a few of the issues we frequently examine:
In Indiana, SFSTs are generally voluntary. While cooperation with law enforcement is often advisable, drivers have the right to refuse these tests. It’s essential to remember, though, that refusing a field sobriety test can sometimes heighten officer suspicion and may lead to further testing requests or an implied consent warning for a chemical test. Refusing a certified chemical test, such as a breathalyzer, does carry its own set of penalties under Indiana’s implied consent laws, including a license suspension of up to one year.
The Marc Lopez Law Firm provides an approach to DUI/OWI defense built on knowledge and experience. Here’s how we make a difference:
A DUI/OWI charge in Indiana is serious, and having the right team in your corner makes all the difference. The Marc Lopez Law Firm is dedicated to defending clients charged with DUI or OWI, applying our comprehensive approach, legal experience, and commitment to client success. If you’re facing a DUI or OVWI charge, don’t hesitate to reach out. Call us today at 317-632-3642, and let us help you take control of your defense. Remember—always plead the 5th!